| Peer-Reviewed

An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention

Received: 22 September 2013     Published: 20 October 2013
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Research has consistently showed that government has been held in low regard and the loss of confidence in government is mainly due to low productivity and inefficiency of government. The police are also confronted with low productivity. Citizens have more demands, but police have fewer resources. Increasing productivity is considered as an important task for government. Many politicians adopted “reinventing the government” as their slogan, and the coproduction effort has been recognized and promoted as “the law enforcement manifestation of reinventing movement”. This movement is apparently gaining tremendous support not only from law enforcement agencies but also from the general public. However, it has not been completely assured that collective citizen involvement in crime prevention is a sound and effective way to control crime, and thus reduce fear of crime. This research examines the effectiveness and problems associated with the coproduction effort such as Neighborhood Watch Program and Citizen Patrol.

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11
Page(s) 161-167
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Co-production, Crime Prevention, Neighborhood Watch, Citizen Patrol

References
[1] National Commission on the Public Service, "Leadership for America: Rebuilding the Public Service," Washington D.C.: Paul A. Volcker, Chairman, 1989.
[2] J. Hawdon and J. Ryan, "Police–resident Interactions and Satisfaction with Police: An Empirical Test of Community Policing Assertions," Criminal Justice Policy Review, vol. 14, pp. 55-74, 2003.
[3] G. A. Gerasimos and J. G. Davis, "Reinventing or Repackaging Public Services? The Case of Community-Oriented Policing," Public Administration Review, vol. 58, pp. 485-498, 1998.
[4] A. Pattavina, J. M. Byrne and L. Garcia, "An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention in High-risk Versus Low- to Moderate-risk Neighborhoods," Crime and Delinquency, vol. 52, pp. 203-231, 2013.
[5] R. Warren, S. M. Rosentraub and S. K. Harlow, "Coproduction, Equity and the Distribution of Safety," Urban Affairs Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 447-464, 1984.
[6] T. Bovaird, "Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services," Public Administration Review, vol. 67, pp. 846-860, 2007.
[7] T. Brannan, P. John and G. Stoker, "Active Citizenship and Effective Public Services and Programmes: How Can We Know What Really Works?," Urban Studies, vol. 43, pp. 993-1008, 2006.
[8] M. J. Marschall, "Citizen Participation and the Neighborhood Context: A New Look at the Coproduction of Local Public Goods," Political Research Quarterly, vol. 57, pp. 231-244, 2004.
[9] V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere, "New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-production," New York, NY: Rutledge, 2012.
[10] L. S. Percy, "Citizen Involvement in the Co-producing Safety and Security in the Community," Public Productivity and Management Review, vol. 42, pp. 83-93, 1987.
[11] P. J. Lavarakas, J. Normoyle, W. G. Skogan, E. J. Hertz, G. Salem and D. A. Lewis, "Factors Related to Citizen Involvement in Personal, Household, and Neighborhood Anti-crime Measures," Washington, DC; Government Printing Office, 1981.
[12] P. D. Rosenbaum, "The Theory and Research behind Neighborhood Watch," Crime and Delinquency, vol. 33, pp. 103-134, 1987.
[13] National Institute of Justice, "Citizen Crime Prevention Tactics," U.S Department of Justice, 1980.
[14] M. Jakobsen, "Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment," The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 23, pp. 27-54, 2013.
[15] National Institute of Justice, "Factors Influencing Crime and Instability in Urban Housing Developments," U.S. Department of Justice, 2007.
[16] E. Leher, "Communities and Cops Join Forces: Effectiveness of Community Policing," Insight on the News, vol. 15, pp. 16-25, 1999.
[17] E. Ostrom, "Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development," World Development, vol. 24, pp. 1073‒1087, 1996.
[18] National Institute of Justice, "Informal Citizen Action and Crime Prevention at the Neighborhood Level," U.S. Department of Justice, 1985.
[19] J. A. Schafer, B. Huebner and T. Bynum, "Citizen Perceptions of Police Services," Police Quarterly, vol. 6, pp. 440-468, 2003.
[20] L. William, "Equity and the Planning of Local Services," Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 47, pp. 447-457, 1981.
[21] L. R. Lineberry, "Mandating Urban Equality; The Distribution of Municipal Public Services," N.Y: Longman, 1985.
[22] M. W. Rohe and S. W. Greenberg, "Participation in the Community Watch Programs," Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 6, vol. 53-65, 1984.
[23] National Institute of Justice, "Safe and Secure Neighborhoods," U.S. Department of Justice, 1982.
[24] D. G. Suttles, "The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City," Chicago; University of Chicago Press, 1968.
[25] M. C. Scheider, T. Rowell and V. Bezdikian, "The Impact of Citizen Perceptions of Community Policing on Fear of Crime: Findings from Twelve Cities," Police Quarterly, vol. 6, pp. 363-386, 2003.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ho-Youn Kim. (2013). An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention. Social Sciences, 2(5), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ho-Youn Kim. An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention. Soc. Sci. 2013, 2(5), 161-167. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ho-Youn Kim. An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention. Soc Sci. 2013;2(5):161-167. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11,
      author = {Ho-Youn Kim},
      title = {An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention},
      journal = {Social Sciences},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {161-167},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20130205.11},
      abstract = {Research has consistently showed that government has been held in low regard and the loss of confidence in government is mainly due to low productivity and inefficiency of government. The police are also confronted with low productivity. Citizens have more demands, but police have fewer resources. Increasing productivity is considered as an important task for government. Many politicians adopted “reinventing the government” as their slogan, and the coproduction effort has been recognized and promoted as “the law enforcement manifestation of reinventing movement”. This movement is apparently gaining tremendous support not only from law enforcement agencies but also from the general public. However, it has not been completely assured that collective citizen involvement in crime prevention is a sound and effective way to control crime, and thus reduce fear of crime. This research examines the effectiveness and problems associated with the coproduction effort such as Neighborhood Watch Program and Citizen Patrol.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention
    AU  - Ho-Youn Kim
    Y1  - 2013/10/20
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11
    T2  - Social Sciences
    JF  - Social Sciences
    JO  - Social Sciences
    SP  - 161
    EP  - 167
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-988X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20130205.11
    AB  - Research has consistently showed that government has been held in low regard and the loss of confidence in government is mainly due to low productivity and inefficiency of government. The police are also confronted with low productivity. Citizens have more demands, but police have fewer resources. Increasing productivity is considered as an important task for government. Many politicians adopted “reinventing the government” as their slogan, and the coproduction effort has been recognized and promoted as “the law enforcement manifestation of reinventing movement”. This movement is apparently gaining tremendous support not only from law enforcement agencies but also from the general public. However, it has not been completely assured that collective citizen involvement in crime prevention is a sound and effective way to control crime, and thus reduce fear of crime. This research examines the effectiveness and problems associated with the coproduction effort such as Neighborhood Watch Program and Citizen Patrol.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Dept. of Security Management, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea

  • Sections